Skip to main content
    Kriv AI

    AI Security

    Claude AI security: what Anthropic's controls cover and what your team still sets

    A plain guide for security leads and IT owners who are deciding whether to roll out Claude, Claude Code or Claude Cowork. It sticks to what Anthropic documents, says where that documentation stops, and lists the settings that stay with your team.

    Claude AI security comes down to three questions: where Claude runs, what it is allowed to touch, and who approves what it does. Anthropic's documentation says that in Manual mode Claude Code starts with read-only permissions and asks before it edits files or runs commands, that Auto mode is the built-in starting mode for interactive terminal and VS Code sessions, and that Cowork sessions run in an isolated, temporary environment. Anthropic also says isolation limits where Claude's code runs, not what Claude reads or does, and that the chances of an attack are still non-zero. The controls that matter most in daily use are therefore yours: narrow folder access, reviewed connectors, approval modes and logs.

    definition

    What does Claude AI security cover?

    Claude AI security covers the controls around Claude as it is actually used: the chat product, Claude Code in a terminal or editor, and Claude Cowork for multi-step tasks on files and apps. Each runs in a different place and can reach different things, so the security questions differ by product.

    Anthropic documents its safeguards on its own help center and docs sites. This page summarizes what those pages said when we read them on 2026-11-10 and links to them. Check the source for anything you plan to rely on, because these pages change.

    cowork controls

    What are Claude Cowork's security controls?

    Claude Cowork security, as Anthropic's help article describes it, starts with where the work runs. The article says "Cowork sessions run in the cloud on Anthropic's servers" and that Claude's work runs in an isolated, temporary environment that can't reach your home or company network and is removed when the session ends.

    The same article is direct about the limit of that isolation: "Isolation limits where Claude's code runs. It doesn't limit what Claude reads or does." If you connect folders, apps or the web, Claude can use them, so what you connect is the real boundary.

    Anthropic lists multiple layers of protection, including reinforcement learning to train Claude to recognize and refuse malicious instructions, scanning of untrusted content that enters Claude's context to flag potential injections, and, in "Automatically approve" mode, a review of each action before it runs. The article also says Cowork requires your explicit permission before permanently deleting any files, and that when Claude uses your computer it asks permission before accessing each application.

    On residual risk the article says "the chances of an attack are still non-zero." Its advice includes a dedicated working folder instead of broad access, starting with lower-stakes tasks, and using "Manually approve" when a task touches sensitive files, accounts or sites.

    claude code controls

    How do Claude Code's permissions work?

    Anthropic's Claude Code security page describes a permission-based design. Anthropic says Auto mode is the built-in starting mode for interactive terminal and VS Code sessions. In Manual mode, "Claude Code starts with read-only permissions" and asks before it edits files, runs tests or executes commands; you choose whether to approve once or allow it from then on. In Auto mode, a separate classifier model reviews actions instead of you and blocks the ones it judges unsafe. Your organization can turn auto mode off.

    The page lists built-in protections: a sandboxed bash tool with filesystem and network isolation, a working directory boundary, allowlisting of commonly used commands, and fail-closed matching so unmatched commands need approval in Manual mode. It notes that the directory boundary is a permission prompt, so a Bash command you approve can still write anywhere your user account can. Sandboxing is how you restrict that at the operating system level.

    For teams, the page points to managed settings to enforce organizational standards, OpenTelemetry metrics to monitor usage, and hooks that can audit or block settings changes during sessions. For a deeper look at governing Claude Code in a company, see our guide to Claude Code governance.

    prompt injection

    Where does prompt injection still matter?

    Anthropic's Claude Code page defines it as a technique where an attacker attempts to override or manipulate an AI assistant's instructions by inserting malicious text. Examples include a web page, a document or an email Claude reads. The page also lists safeguards, including approval for network commands such as curl and wget and a separate model call that summarizes fetched web pages so Claude does not see the raw page for most fetches.

    Anthropic's pages are candid that these safeguards reduce risk and do not remove it. The Claude Code page says: "no system is completely immune to all attacks." Treat any content from outside your organization as untrusted, and keep approval prompts on for actions that send data out or change systems of record.

    connectors

    What about connectors and MCP servers?

    Connectors and Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers extend what Claude can reach. Anthropic's Claude Code page says it encourages writing your own MCP servers or using ones from providers you trust, that you can configure permissions for MCP servers, and that Anthropic reviews connectors against its listing criteria before adding them to its directory but does not security-audit or manage any MCP server.

    That puts the vetting of each connector with your team. Keep a list of what is connected, who approved it, and what data it can reach.

    checklist

    What should your team set before rollout?

    Use this list in a review with your security and IT owners. It is a set of questions, not a legal opinion or an audit.

    Which Claude products will staff use, and on which plan? The controls differ for chat, Claude Code and Cowork.

    Which folders, apps and accounts can Claude reach? Is each one needed for the task?

    Which approval mode is the default, and who may change it? Is Auto mode allowed for your organization?

    Is sandboxing on for Claude Code, and is there a restriction on network access?

    Which connectors and MCP servers are approved, and who reviews new ones?

    What stays out of Claude entirely, such as credentials or regulated records, and how is that enforced rather than just written in a policy?

    Where are usage and actions logged, and who looks at the logs?

    What do staff do when something looks wrong? Anthropic's advice for Cowork is to stop the task immediately.

    not first

    What we do not recommend doing first

    We do not recommend switching on broad access and relying on the model to refuse bad instructions. Anthropic's own documentation describes layers of protection and still advises limiting access and keeping approvals on for sensitive work. Start with one team, one folder and Manual approval, then widen access as you learn how it behaves.

    how kriv helps

    How Kriv AI helps

    Kriv AI has achieved the Select partner tier in the Claude Partner Network Services Track. We help teams plan and configure Claude rollouts, including permission settings, connector review, approval rules and staff training, with work informed by Anthropic's published security documentation. We do not give legal advice and this page is not a security audit of your environment. Engagements are scoped and priced after a short discovery call.

    Straight answers

    Frequently asked questions about Claude AI security: what Anthropic's controls cover and what your team still sets

    Is Claude Cowork secure?

    Anthropic describes layered safeguards for Claude Cowork: an isolated, temporary environment, scanning for prompt injection, review of each action, and permission prompts for deleting files. It also says the chances of an attack are still non-zero, so limit what Cowork can access and use manual approval for sensitive tasks.

    Does Claude Code ask before changing my files?

    Anthropic says Auto mode is the built-in starting mode for interactive terminal and VS Code sessions. In Manual mode, Anthropic says Claude Code starts with read-only permissions and asks before it edits files or runs commands. In Auto mode a separate classifier model reviews actions instead, and an organization can turn auto mode off.

    Can Claude be tricked by text in a web page or document?

    That is called prompt injection. Anthropic documents safeguards against it and also says no system is completely immune to all attacks. Treat outside content as untrusted and keep approvals on for actions that send data out.

    Does Anthropic security-check MCP servers and connectors?

    Anthropic says it reviews connectors against its listing criteria before adding them to its directory, but does not security-audit or manage any MCP server. Your team should vet each one it connects.

    Where can I read Anthropic's own security documentation?

    The sources used for this page are linked below: Anthropic's Claude Code security page and its help article on using Claude Cowork. Read them directly before you decide, because they are updated over time.

    Does Kriv AI provide legal advice or a security audit?

    No. We help teams plan and configure Claude rollouts, working with your security and legal owners. This page is general information, not an audit of your environment.

    Talk to the team that would do the work

    Bring your requirements to a working session with the person who'll actually deliver.

    Book a Discovery Call